Beta Testing

An article this week on, a sister site of, reported on a California startup’s plan to broadly market the medication propranolol as a quality-of-life aid, including to reduce nervousness associated with public speaking.

Companies looking to innovate and disrupt will continue to explore new solutions to old problems, and vice versa. But this particular idea causes me concern as a speech professional.

Beta blockers are a class of medications used to treat irregular heartbeat and/or high blood pressure by temporarily blocking effects of adrenaline, a hormone central to our “fight or flight” responses (in other words, that promotes our survival!). Developed in the 1960s, propranolol was one of the first beta blockers, and continues in clinical use.

Along the line, people discovered “off-label” uses in situations where “nerves” may be a factor, including precision activities like archery, golf, musical performance, and of course, public speaking.

In my experiences as a communication coach and medical speech pathologist, I’ve encountered a few people, often with more challenging speech conditions such as stuttering or vocal tremor, who reported benefit from beta blockers, in conjunction with speech work and other supports.

But the idea that a typical person who feels anxious about public speaking (possibly a majority of people in the world!) could simply turn to a pharmaceutical “little helper” in mint or watermelon flavor, is, if you’ll forgive the pun, a hard pill to swallow.

All medications can have side effects. Beta blockers and propranolol in particular are contraindicated as potentially dangerous for people with certain medical conditions, or who take certain other medications. And while they are generally not thought to be addictive in the physiologic sense, regular use in higher-pressure situations can foster reliance and the belief that they are necessary to deliver a satisfactory performance.

The idea of a quick fix for public speaking nervousness is enticing, but the personalized, skills-based approaches that I and my fellow Speech Improvement coaches use with our clients are preferable for many reasons. We help people recognize and replace negative thinking associated with past fear of speaking, building confidence in its place. We offer guidance with specific, time-tested techniques. And rather than beta-blocking the body’s signals, we can help people listen to and learn from them, even harnessing the energy of adrenaline in positive ways so a well-prepared talk or presentation can feel thrilling rather than terrifying.

A prescription can run out, but speaking skills developed through investment of time and effort are earned, one’s own, and can’t be taken away. So if, in the near future, a slick ad suggests that the answer to your public speaking concerns is in a pill: just say NO!

Spread the love


Similar posts

Identifying Manipulative Communication in the Workplace

Manipulative communication in the workplace decreases work efficiency, increases job dissatisfaction, contributes to a hostile environment and lowers morale. Most people are challenged to identify manipulative tactics and even when they spot them, they do not feel competent in responding effectively. Spotting the manipulator can be difficult. They can be everywhere that humans are found. The manipulator can be anyone! They are difficult to identify because they are so well camouflaged and have no outwardly

Spread the love

Sometimes It Takes All Day To Get Nothing Done

In the past three years, we’ve had to look for creative ways to collaborate. We’re in the era of real-time virtual technology mixed with in-person meetings. It’s overwhelming. When we’re overwhelmed and spread too thin, we tune out and barely participate in one meeting as we often try to multitask. Zoom, Teams, Slack, WhatsApp, and many others give us no reason not to collaborate on our day-to-day jobs. However, with so many meetings, are we

Spread the love

Defensiveness Prevents Clear Communication

The First Moment: Defensiveness  If your listener is defensive, your point is probably missed. They have been left with the impression that you, intentionally or not, are criticizing their idea or them. Instead of focusing on getting solutions, they will be driven by this passion for defending the idea or their persona. They are struggling, and it may be your fault. You may have needed to set the right expectations; your tone may have needed

Spread the love