Don’t Tell People What They Want to Hear

Man holding up his hand to stop a one-on-one conversation

One of the quickest ways for a leader to lose credibility is to start telling people what they want to hear.

It usually begins with good intentions. You sense what someone values. You notice what they want the answer to be. And you shape the message to match it.

In the moment, it can feel persuasive. But it isn’t persuasion. It’s manipulation.

Real persuasion works differently. It doesn’t tell people what they want to hear. It helps them hear what they need to hear in order to move forward.

And that requires understanding how people are persuaded in the first place.

Different People Are Persuaded by Different Things

In almost every leadership conversation, you’ll find listeners who instinctively lean toward one of three persuasive anchors:

Ethos

Can we trust the judgment behind this?

These listeners are persuaded by credibility, experience, and demonstrated understanding. They want to know the person speaking has the perspective and authority to guide the situation.

Pathos

Does this feel right for us?

These listeners are persuaded by meaning, values, and the human stakes involved. They want to understand how the decision aligns with purpose, culture, and the impact on people.

Logos

Does this actually make sense?

These listeners are persuaded by reasoning, evidence, and structure. They want to see the logic and the plan before they commit.

In almost every executive conversation, different listeners will place different weight on all three. Which means the leader’s job is not to choose one persuasive mode; it’s to understand how each participant enters the conversation.

The Manipulation Shortcut

Once you recognize what persuades someone, there’s a tempting shortcut. You tell the Ethos person what validates their authority. You tell the Pathos person what affirms their values. You tell the Logos person the logic they already want to believe.

In other words, you mirror their preference. You tell them what they want to hear. And in the short term, that can win agreement. But it doesn’t create alignment.

The message isn’t anchored in reality. It’s anchored in appeasement.

The Persuasion Standard

Real influence requires a different discipline.

Instead of telling people what they want to hear, leaders use Ethos, Pathos, and Logos to help people hear what they need to hear.

Establish Ethos so listeners trust the judgment behind the message. Engage Pathos so listeners understand why the stakes matter. Deliver Logos so listeners can clearly see the reasoning and the path forward.

Each mode becomes a doorway for a different kind of listener, but they all lead to the same place: Clarity, Alignment, Action.

The Leadership Discipline

The discipline of executive communication isn’t learning how to say the right thing to each person. It’s learning how to anchor different listeners in the same truth.

Some will enter through credibility. Some through meaning. Some through logic. Your responsibility as a leader is to make sure the message reaches them.

Not because it’s what they wanted to hear, but because it’s what they needed to hear in order to move forward.

Author

Spread the love

Authors

MORE POSTS

People applauding a great presentation at an annual investor meeting

15 Moments That Got Big Laughs at This Year’s 2026 Fall Annual Investor Meetings

One of my favorite types of articles to write is these recap blogs. Annual Investor Meetings (AIMs) are high-stakes events where a room full of LPs and executives digest hours of financial updates, market outlooks, and portfolio performance. While solid metrics and a clear strategy carry the presentation, well-placed humor builds trust, resets attention, and makes both the speakers and the firm memorable. LPs see SO MANY of these types of meetings, so as a

Spread the love

What’s Wrong With Our Communication?

“We need to work on our communication skills.” “We have a communication problem.” “We need to fix our communication.” As an expert at the intersection of people/organizations and communication for over 20 years, I have heard these comments many times. But what does it mean to solve communication problems, or to make the communication in your company “better”? To share information about a major change successfully? To manage that one employee who can’t get along

Spread the love

The Terrain Informs the Technique

In executive coaching, you hear a lot of singular techniques — one framework, one mindset, one magic fix that’s supposed to solve everything. In reality, even the best techniques only work when they adapt to the terrain. The central lesson is simple: knowing not just what to do, but when and why to do it. It’s the difference between approach and technique, strategy and tactic. When I run in the mountains, I shorten my stride whether I’m going uphill or downhill, but for entirely different reasons.

Spread the love

QUESTIONS? NEED HELP?

Tell us what’s on your mind: