Communicate 34x More Effectively

I often caution people on their use of email. Of course it’s fast and convenient, but an important message or request may be diluted for that very reason: you chose a fast, convenient (for you) method to deliver it. If being heard is important, a phone call is far better. And meeting face-to-face gives you the most successful vehicle for delivering your message. A recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and reported in the Harvard Business Review quantifies it. They claim face-to-face is 34 times more effective than email when asking someone to do something for you. The report can be read here.

The research concludes “it’s worth considering whether you could be a more effective communicator by having conversations in person. It is often more convenient and comfortable to use text-based communication than to approach someone in-person, but if you overestimate the effectiveness of such media, you may regularly—and unknowingly—choose inferior means of influence.”

Taking the time to be 34x more effective is worth considering when I write my next email.

Author

Spread the love

Authors

MORE POSTS

People applauding a great presentation at an annual investor meeting

15 Moments That Got Big Laughs at This Year’s 2026 Fall Annual Investor Meetings

One of my favorite types of articles to write is these recap blogs. Annual Investor Meetings (AIMs) are high-stakes events where a room full of LPs and executives digest hours of financial updates, market outlooks, and portfolio performance. While solid metrics and a clear strategy carry the presentation, well-placed humor builds trust, resets attention, and makes both the speakers and the firm memorable. LPs see SO MANY of these types of meetings, so as a

Spread the love

What’s Wrong With Our Communication?

“We need to work on our communication skills.” “We have a communication problem.” “We need to fix our communication.” As an expert at the intersection of people/organizations and communication for over 20 years, I have heard these comments many times. But what does it mean to solve communication problems, or to make the communication in your company “better”? To share information about a major change successfully? To manage that one employee who can’t get along

Spread the love

The Terrain Informs the Technique

In executive coaching, you hear a lot of singular techniques — one framework, one mindset, one magic fix that’s supposed to solve everything. In reality, even the best techniques only work when they adapt to the terrain. The central lesson is simple: knowing not just what to do, but when and why to do it. It’s the difference between approach and technique, strategy and tactic. When I run in the mountains, I shorten my stride whether I’m going uphill or downhill, but for entirely different reasons.

Spread the love

QUESTIONS? NEED HELP?

Tell us what’s on your mind: