-
Obama’s Healthcare Speech
Posted on September 11th, 2009 No commentsBy Senior Coaching Partner Dr. Dennis BeckerPresident Obama gave an impassioned presentation on the topic of Healthcare Reform. We have been monitoring and critiquing his speeches and speaking style from the outset of the primaries. We have reviewed and commented on many, many of those speeches and press conferences, etc.. This speech had some of the same techniques and cadence. But, in this speech I heard and saw something different. Yes, he had the same articulation prowess. Yes, he had the same powerful use of language. Yes, he had the same air of confidence. Yes, he had the same control of the moment and the audience. Yes, we saw the usual dynamism of a good speaker. But, this time, I saw more. This time I heard more. This time I saw and heard the President use many more “color words”. These are words which any speaker emphasizes in a slightly different way than other words. Those words add “color” the otherwise black and white sound of the speaker. Mr. Obama often depends on his exquisite use of language and his precise skill at presentation. He is very good. Whether you like his politics or not, most reasonable people will agree that Mr. Obama is a very good speaker.His use of “color words” was carefully applied. We saw most of it in two places in the speech. We heard “color words” used effectively in the first 10 minutes of the speech. We heard “color words” used effectively again in the segment that referred to the late Senator Kennedy. To me, that was the most touching and poignant part of the speech. The addition of this “color” to his speaking style was a positive. It helped him seem more human and less robotic and practiced.It was also interesting to note that he showed his comfort in using the media, in this case TV, to his benefit. He looked directly into the camera, at us at home, seven times. Each time he was referring to “Americans”, “Seniors”, etc. It was a very effective use of the camera.Finally, he handled the very rare and unexpected outburst from a Republican attendee who shouted out “you lie!”. He handled it very well. Basically, he recognized it with a glance in that direction and went on, unshaken. This was one of President Obama’s best deliveries of a speech.One closing thought on a slightly different topic: I watched the speech on CNN. Unfortunately, the program was hosted by Wolf Blitzer. This intelligent and experienced newsman continues to have one of the most distracting, unprofessional, and unattractive speech habits. It is his constant use of the vocalized pause, “uh”. Mr. Blitzer, pleeease learn control this awful habit. -
I FEEL VERY SORRY FOR THEM
Posted on September 1st, 2009 No commentsby Senior Coaching Partner Dr. Dennis Becker
Today I heard another one of the ultra conservative talk show stars talking about Ted Kennedy’s funeral and the things that people said as part of the eulogies. Oh, yes, I do refer to them as “stars” because I have to believe that is their desire – to be seen as some sort of media star or public figure which gives them the call to fill the airwaves with vitriol an childish, schoolyard name calling….but ,I digress…
Todays verbal bully was Laura somebody or else. I’m sure she would like me to use her name. That’s truly insignificant. What she said is more bothersome, and should be more insulting to everyone who cherishes the kindness that humans of all races and cultures show to one another during times of pain,tears, and suffering…times like the death of a loved one…ah, I digress again…Todays insensitive and inaccurate bullying was about what President Obama said as part of his eulogy. She accused the President of “politicizing” this sad event. Todays whining claimed that President Obama urged us to honor Ted Kennedy’s memory by passing the Healthcare legislation that Kennedy had fought for during his life. First of all, and as usual, that is not true. I heard the entire eulogy , listened to it twice, in fact, to be sure of what I was hearing. He never urged such a thing. But bullies, verbal of physical, don’t care much about accuracy or truth. They shape it to fit their form of bullying. So, in effect, todays whining and bullying was not much different than any other day, or any other schoolyard, by any other common bully.I feel sorry for them. I really do. As a communication coach, I feel sorry for their inability to be more productive and more friendly toward those who may see things differently than they do. I feel sorry for their insistence on showing a fist rather than an open hand. I feel sorry that they can’t rise above schoolyard posturing . The simple fact that they can earn or buy time on radio or tv to draw attention to themselves and stir the passions of those less informed or less capable of understanding the complexities of legislation and politics is weak justification for using their “star” role to step on the solemn proceedings of a funeral, anybody’s funeral. It would be nice to hear some answers to our problems rather than simple minded accusations and insults. Who does that really help in the end?On the other hand, I guess these are the type of people who my grandmother was talking about when she told me, “it’s easier to tear down a cathedral than it is to build a dog house”. -
Remembering Senator Edward Kennedy
Posted on August 27th, 2009 No commentsby Dr. Dennis Becker, CEO, The Speech Improvement Company
When Robert Kennedy was murdered, like a lot of people, I was devastated. To me, he represented the most hope for bridging the gap between the haves and the have-nots in our society. Of course, I was particularly impassioned by his fight for the civil rights issue. He had the ability to both reach out and to point the way at the same tie. His communication prowess was an inspiration to me and my work as a Communication Coach.
At that time, I was also President of the New England Speech Association. On behalf of the association and as a citizen, I wrote a letter of condolence to Bobby’s brother, Edward (Ted) Kennedy. I’m certain that he received many, many such letters. To my amazement I received a personal reply from Teddy (as we all came to know him). It was a warm letter, thanking me for my expression and and encouraging me to carry on what his brother (s) stood for. He signed it in ink, Edward Kennedy.
He and his brothers John and Robert will always be a living example of why and how important it is for all of us to learn to speak and listen to others, especially those who are different and less fortunate than ourselves. I will continue, in my life, to carry their example of good communication.
Here are some inspiring words Ted spoke at his brother Robert’s funeral in 1968, which so resonate today:
“That is the way he lived. That is what he leaves us.
My brother need not be idealized, or enlarged in death beyond what he was in life; to be remembered simply as a good and decent man, who saw wrong and tried to right it, saw suffering and tried to heal it, saw war and tried to stop it.
Those of us who loved him and who take him to his rest today, pray that what he was to us and what he wished for others will someday come to pass for all the world.
As he said many times, in many parts of this nation, to those he touched and who sought to touch him:
“Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not.”
-
Why Do People Fear Speaking?
Posted on August 4th, 2009 No comments“This question presupposes what to most of society is a given. Speaking to groups is a scary proposition. In fact, it is one of the most prominent fears of all humans. Each survey that is taken places it in the top three, almost every single time. It would be interesting for you to ask a few friends if they feel nervous or fearful about speaking before groups. I’m sure you’ll get mixed replies, of course. One thing you’ll notice, even from those who express little or no fear, is a caution. You will hear statements like ‘It depends on who’s in the group,’ and ‘Well, only some groups.’
It’s not uncommon to hear of career opportunities that have been passed by because they require ‘public speaking.’ It’s not only anxiety about groups. It is also common to find that the anxiety extends to certain types of individuals such as those in positions of authority, or people who are more senior, or, perhaps, people who have different cultures, etc. The fear can be triggered by many things.
So, how do we help people to control that fear? I am not using the term ‘overcome’ to describe the outcome. The very word ‘overcome’ can be too compelling. It can put too much pressure on sufferers to eliminate the fear. So, we strive to gain control over it. This is not a capitulation. It is a recognition that each person will go as far as is needed to regain control over the experience of speaking to groups.
As Speech Coaches for The Speech Improvement Company, we bring 45 years of experience to this effort. We recognize that there are two popular methods for ‘treating’ fear of speaking. They are Visualization and Cognitive Restructuring. Over the years, we have utilized each of these. However, by far we have found most positive results with the Skills approach. That is, we help clients identify and understand exactly what it is that triggers the fear. Then we introduce specific skills to fill any void in the ability to combat that trigger. This process eventually leads to the elimination of the fear inducing triggers. It has been very successful.”
-
Talking about Talking Series: The Gates-gate
Posted on July 31st, 2009 No commentsClick on the link below to watch a video featuring coaches Dr. Dennis Becker and Laurie Schloff.
-
Dr. Dennis Becker on The arrest of Henry Gates
Posted on July 27th, 2009 2 commentsby Dr. Dennis Becker.
“Isn’t human communication fascinating?! This whole Gates-Cambridge Police-Crowley-Obama flap is just the latest in the ongoing saga of humans attempting to communicate with each other. By this time, we all pretty much know what happened:Gates lost his keys to his home and couldn’t get in, Gates asks help of his limo driver to push the door in, Neighbor observes two “black men with back packs” doing this, Neighbor, being good neighbor, calls the police and reports attempted break-in, police arrive, Officer Crowley knocks on door, Gates comes to door, Crowley asks for identification, Gates retrieves Harvard ID card to verify his ownership and occupancy, Crowley accepts response and turns to leave porch, Gates complains about being harassed because of being a black man, Gates emerges from house onto front porch and continues commentary, Crowley replies with comment on Gates being public disturbance or disturbing the peace and arrests Gates.
Gates is placed in handcuffs behind his back, Gates complains he uses a cane and can’t walk with hands behind him, different officer intervenes and handcuffs are changed to front of Gates as he is taken to jail.
Now, obviously I’m summarizing broadly here. You can watch the video of both Gates and Crowley describing what happened.
I realize that there were nuances of inflection, facial expression, body language, volume, vocabulary, and more which were in play during the actual incident. I realize that it is important for us to engage in rhetorical analysis of the micro elements of this communication, if for no other reason than to learn from it. All of this can be justified from the perspective of wanting to help others who may be confronted with similar situations. I get that.
So, as a communication coach with more than 40 years of experience, allow me to suggest what would have served better for both Gates and Crowley. These two intelligent, accomplished professionals should be embarrassed for themselves for not being able to simply chalk this up to poor, but understandably human judgment at the time of the incident.
Each of these men entered that situation with personal and professional “baggage,” probably harkening as far back as early childhood, regarding issues of authority, privacy, race and respect. Each of these men, in retrospect, is still being controlled by those same long-standing attitudes which enable the “baggage” they carry. Gates should have thanked the officer for doing his duty. He should have overlooked the “attitude” that may have been conveyed in body language, vocabulary, etc. He should have immediately called his neighbor and offered thanks for the caring, watchful eye.
Crowley should have, after verifying the identity of Gates, apologized for any inconvenience and explained that he was simply responding to a report of a break-in and following usual protocol. He then should have simply turned and left the premises. He has probably done this many times before. So, as my Jewish friends would say, “Why should this night be any different than any other night?” Well, that’s human nature. We get very defensive as an initial means of interaction in what appears to be a threatening situation. No, not necessarily physically threatening, but threatening to authority, privacy, race and respect. Most of us lash out with the first two human communication tools we have – body language and speech. That is, we give a “look,” a “gesture,” a “mumble,” a “snicker.” You all know what I’m describing. We have all done it on occasion. It’s a human’s way of “defending” turf and self. On the receiving end, it gets regarded as disrespect or a challenge. If the reaction isn’t strong or obvious enough, there are always onlookers who can add “Ooh, are you gonna’ take that?” and we all know where it goes from there. Suddenly, all our “baggage” starts to unravel and the humans have two options: one is verbal/nonverbal and the other is physical.
Both of these men were at fault. Each should have acted more responsibly in recognizing the setting and circumstances that brought them together. Both of them should simply recognize their actions as the heat of the moment, while not being “wrong” were triggering and were triggered.
To top it off, now Obama is in it! His remarks did not serve him well. His vocabulary did not serve him or others well. He does not have an equal right to proclaim positions and expect little or no repercussion. He too has “baggage.” He’s human. All humans have “baggage,” but he is the President of the most powerful nation on the planet. He is a historical figure in so many ways. Whether we agree with him or not, he must be a bit more accepting – his casual, over the back fence, friendly, neighborly opinion just ain’t that. He’s The President of the most powerful nation on the planet! However, the rest of us must also accept his humanness and be able to step back from the fake heat that is generated by those who live off the “baggage” of others.
There are so many more critical issues in the world. Why are we not blogging about Darfur, or child molestation, or hunger, etc. Come on folks, keep it real! Try carrying your “baggage” in the other hand for a while.”
Dr. Dennis Becker is CEO , Principal & Senior Coaching Partner at The Speech Improvement Company.


